VMD-L Mailing List
From: Diego Gomes (diego.enry_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue May 14 2024 - 10:18:44 CDT
- Next message: Ravithree Senanayake: "namdenergy plugin energy values"
- Previous message: DENILSON FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA: "NUMLP NUMLPH section eliminated by VMD 1.9.4a57"
- In reply to: DENILSON FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA: "NUMLP NUMLPH section eliminated by VMD 1.9.4a57"
- Next in thread: DENILSON FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA: "Re: NUMLP NUMLPH section eliminated by VMD 1.9.4a57"
- Reply: DENILSON FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA: "Re: NUMLP NUMLPH section eliminated by VMD 1.9.4a57"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Denilson,
I can review your issue if you send me the .pdb and .psf.
-- Diego On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 8:52 AM DENILSON FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA < denilson_at_ufla.br> wrote: > Dear all, > > 1) I generated psf and pdb files with VMD 1.9.4a57, for a protein complex > with a ligand, using the Charmm force field topology files, which I > obtained on November 13, 2021, from https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mackerell__;!!DZ3fjg!865ySZWJlsusapjnK7iEUK6mEWxn9Vpg86xRYEFPet_gc6uhIKDW7huo5cWMJPPc-Vb-U3-FMXQPKx8cFGfC$ > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mackerell__;!!DZ3fjg!9ySzr4oryoRSVTF8v-hjgFGDp358ZuCSPZcAOLoqhcRuf87uj1zC6vmVQKEcl0MIHu8p3NWwczr04WXB1gM$>. > umaryland.edu/charmm_ff.shtml > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://umaryland.edu/charmm_ff.shtml__;!!DZ3fjg!9ySzr4oryoRSVTF8v-hjgFGDp358ZuCSPZcAOLoqhcRuf87uj1zC6vmVQKEcl0MIHu8p3NWwczr0rodqqnk$>: > toppar_c36_jul21.tgz. > > 2) The ligand contains chlorine atoms. As a result, one electron pair for > each chlorine atom is specified in the pdb file as well as in the psf file. > Furthermore, the NUMLP NUMLPH section appears in the psf file: > > 8 24 !NUMLP NUMLPH > 2 1 F 1.6400 0.0000 0.0000 > 2 4 F 1.6400 0.0000 0.0000 > 2 7 F 1.6400 0.0000 0.0000 > 2 10 F 1.6400 0.0000 0.0000 > 2 13 F 1.6400 0.0000 0.0000 > 2 16 F 1.6400 0.0000 0.0000 > 2 19 F 1.6400 0.0000 0.0000 > 2 22 F 1.6400 0.0000 0.0000 > 20815 20786 20779 20816 20802 20792 20855 20826 > 20819 20856 20842 20832 20895 20866 20859 20896 > 20882 20872 20935 20906 20899 20936 20922 20912 > > 3) After optimizing the system with Namd 3.0b6, a coor file was generated. > Then I used the following commands in VMD: > > mol new file.psf > mol addfile file.coor > set all [atomselect top all] > measure center $all > measure minmax $all > $all writepdb new.pdb > $all writepdb new.psf > > 4) The new.psf file does not have the NUMLP NUMLPH section described > above. Therefore, when using the new.psf file for a molecular dynamics > simulation with Namd 3.0b6, the electron pairs of the chlorine atoms fly > around. > > Hence the following question: is there any way to prevent VMD 1.9.4a57 > from eliminating the NUMLP NUMLPH section during the generation of the > new.psf file? > > Thank you in advance for your attention. > > Best wishes. > > Denilson. > > > > O conteúdo deste e-mail e anexos são restritos aos seus destinatários e de > responsabilidade do remetente. O uso do e-mail deve estar de acordo com os > regulamentos institucionais vigentes. > -- Diego Enry B. Gomes, PhD Department of Physics at Auburn University & NIH Center for Macromolecular Modeling and Visualization Leach Science Center - Ste. 3182 - Auburn, AL dgomes_at_auburn.edu
- Next message: Ravithree Senanayake: "namdenergy plugin energy values"
- Previous message: DENILSON FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA: "NUMLP NUMLPH section eliminated by VMD 1.9.4a57"
- In reply to: DENILSON FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA: "NUMLP NUMLPH section eliminated by VMD 1.9.4a57"
- Next in thread: DENILSON FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA: "Re: NUMLP NUMLPH section eliminated by VMD 1.9.4a57"
- Reply: DENILSON FERREIRA DE OLIVEIRA: "Re: NUMLP NUMLPH section eliminated by VMD 1.9.4a57"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]