VMD-L Mailing List
From: Gumbart, JC (gumbart_at_physics.gatech.edu)
Date: Mon Jan 27 2020 - 19:52:53 CST
- Next message: David Sáez: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Previous message: faride badalkhani: "Re: radial atom distribution"
- In reply to: David Sáez: "FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Next in thread: David Sáez: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Reply: David Sáez: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Reply: Adupa Vasista: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hi David,
You should look carefully at the dihedral scan that gives the anomalously low values. There is probably some interaction that is too favorable, possibly due to unrealistic charges. If you suspect that, you can modify the charges to see if it makes a difference.
Best,
JC
On Jan 25, 2020, at 12:07 AM, David Sáez <davidsaezsan_at_gmail.com<mailto:davidsaezsan_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am working on the parametrization of a small molecule using the superb tool called FFToolkit and Gaussian 16. Up to now, it has worked great. Now, in the dihedral section I am facing problems. When trying to find parameters to reproduce the QM potential, I get this plot:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w0h6t27vs0z05ru/Selecc_024.png?dl=0
Is it normal for the preliminary MM potential to be so high in comparison to the QM potential? Should I take a look on the other elements of interaction (charges, angles, bonds) because they could be raising the energy too much?
Thanks for your time.
David.
- Next message: David Sáez: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Previous message: faride badalkhani: "Re: radial atom distribution"
- In reply to: David Sáez: "FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Next in thread: David Sáez: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Reply: David Sáez: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Reply: Adupa Vasista: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]