VMD-L Mailing List
From: David Sáez (davidsaezsan_at_gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 24 2020 - 23:07:00 CST
- Next message: faride badalkhani: "radial atom distribution"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: VMD 1.9.3 compiled from source does not work"
- Next in thread: Gumbart, JC: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Reply: Gumbart, JC: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hello everyone,
I am working on the parametrization of a small molecule using the superb
tool called FFToolkit and Gaussian 16. Up to now, it has worked great. Now,
in the dihedral section I am facing problems. When trying to find
parameters to reproduce the QM potential, I get this plot:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w0h6t27vs0z05ru/Selecc_024.png?dl=0
Is it normal for the preliminary MM potential to be so high in comparison
to the QM potential? Should I take a look on the other elements of
interaction (charges, angles, bonds) because they could be raising the
energy too much?
Thanks for your time.
David.
- Next message: faride badalkhani: "radial atom distribution"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: VMD 1.9.3 compiled from source does not work"
- Next in thread: Gumbart, JC: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Reply: Gumbart, JC: "Re: FFTK dihedral parametrization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]