VMD-L Mailing List
From: Amy Rice (arice3_at_hawk.iit.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2019 - 15:16:00 CST
- Next message: Brian Radak: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Previous message: Dallas Warren: "Re: Regarding image quality in vmd"
- Next in thread: Brian Radak: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Reply: Brian Radak: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Reply: Jérôme Hénin: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hi all,
I noticed that using different versions of ParseFEP (1.9.2 vs 2.1) gives
different free energy output when supplied with the same fepout files and
temperature selection. With 1.9.2, the free energy change was calculated as
-89.320 with a total error of 0.099. The same files in version 2.1 resulted
in a free energy change of -98.704 and a total error of 0.071. Is this
expected behavior? In both cases, I set the temperature to 310 K and
selected to use the BAR-estimator method. Was there a change in how the
calculation is performed between these two versions? It is a little
disconcerting to have such a large difference between the two. I have
attached the log file for both cases.
Best,
Amy
-- Amy Rice Ph.D. Candidate Physics Department Illinois Institute of Technology
- text/x-log attachment: ParseFEP_v1.9.2.log
- text/x-log attachment: ParseFEP_v2.1.log
- Next message: Brian Radak: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Previous message: Dallas Warren: "Re: Regarding image quality in vmd"
- Next in thread: Brian Radak: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Reply: Brian Radak: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Reply: Jérôme Hénin: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]