VMD-L Mailing List
From: McGuire, Kelly (mcg05004_at_byui.edu)
Date: Wed May 23 2018 - 21:19:54 CDT
- Next message: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Scan Torsions"
- Previous message: Vermaas, Joshua: "RE: Scan Torsions"
- In reply to: Vermaas, Joshua: "RE: Scan Torsions"
- Next in thread: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Scan Torsions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Wow, ok that definitely makes sense and makes my life easier with the ring and cage structures we study. Thanks!
Kelly L. McGuire
PhD Scholar
Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology
Brigham Young University
LSB 3050
Provo, UT 84602
________________________________
From: Vermaas, Joshua <Joshua.Vermaas_at_nrel.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 3:39:44 PM
To: McGuire, Kelly; vmd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu
Subject: RE: Scan Torsions
Hi Kelly,
You only actually need to rotate bonds to +/- 180 if the bonds are freely rotateable. That is most definitely not the case for some of your bonds, since rotating some of your bonds past about 45 degrees (? I'm totally guessing here) will break a bond in QM, which is irrelevant to your parameterization effort. What you do in those cases is sample more closely than the FFTK defaults over a smaller range (so maybe +/- 45 in 5 degree increments), and use FFTK to fit the shape of the energy surface around the minimum.
-Josh
On 2018-05-23 13:16:00-06:00 owner-vmd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu wrote:
I am on the Scan Torsions step of the FFTK plugin, and my molecule has a carbon cage (amantadine). Some of the dihedral scans struggle
to finish. I set the scan to do +/- 180 for all of the dihedrals. I'm wondering what the best procedure for a cage type molecule would be
for a torsion scan. Most of them finish with the default MP2/6-31(d), but about 5 of them either end with the internal coordinates error, constraints
errors, or just stops without errors. However, if I change to HF/6-31(d), they finish with normal termination. I don't fully understand the difference between HF
and MP2 other than MP2 is a hartree-fock approximation but with an electron correlation energy correction. How much would it change my results on this
step if I used HF instead of MP2, or is there a better way to get the scan torsion to work for a cage molecule? Thanks!!
Kelly L. McGuire
PhD Scholar
Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology
Brigham Young University
LSB 3050
Provo, UT 84602
- Next message: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Scan Torsions"
- Previous message: Vermaas, Joshua: "RE: Scan Torsions"
- In reply to: Vermaas, Joshua: "RE: Scan Torsions"
- Next in thread: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Scan Torsions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]