From: Aron Broom (broomsday_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 16 2016 - 09:57:04 CDT
are you doing energy minimization or dynamics? you say here 1 ns and talk
about time-steps, that sounds like dynamics. Energy minimization would
just be steps, one can't really assume any particular time.
Assuming it really is minimization, I think you should expect a continuous
decrease in energy over time. I don't really see why it would need to be
straight. Maybe I'm missing something, can you explain why you think it
ought to be straight?
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:05 AM, <d.ronika_at_iitg.ernet.in> wrote:
> In my models used for energy minimization in NAMD, after 1ns i.e., 1000000
> time-steps. I am not getting a completely straight line. Is it compulsary
> to get a totally straight line in the energy minimization step? what are
> the reasons for not getting a completely straight line?
-- Aron Broom M.Sc PhD Student Department of Chemistry University of Waterloo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 27 2016 - 23:22:22 CST