VMD-L Mailing List
From: Smith, Harper E. (smith.12510_at_buckeyemail.osu.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 26 2021 - 11:15:10 CDT
- Next message: Bennion, Brian: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: attachment file size limit for the mailing list"
- Next in thread: Bennion, Brian: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Reply: Bennion, Brian: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Reply: Jason Smith: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Maybe reply: Aleksei: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hi mailing list,
It seems like FFTK is designed specifically for use at the MP2 level of theory. Unfortunately, my small molecule is optimized to the wrong geometry at MP2, but something much closer at HF (especially if I add implicit water).
It seems like my options are:
* Stick to the protocol by proceeding with the flawed geometry that comes from an MP2 optimization
* Deviate from the protocol by switching to HF/SMD, but use a clearly better geometry
Does anyone have any experience with this? Which of these options should I prefer? It seems like either option will give non-ideal results, but I lack the experience to judge which is better.
Best,
Harper Smith
- Next message: Bennion, Brian: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: attachment file size limit for the mailing list"
- Next in thread: Bennion, Brian: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Reply: Bennion, Brian: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Reply: Jason Smith: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Maybe reply: Aleksei: "Re: Switching from MP2 in FFTK?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]