VMD-L Mailing List
From: Gianluca Interlandi (gianluca_at_u.washington.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2014 - 23:55:47 CST
- Next message: John Stone: "Re: "measure bond" vs veclength"
- Previous message: Gianluca Interlandi: ""measure bond" vs veclength"
- In reply to: John Stone: "Re: "measure bond" vs veclength"
- Next in thread: John Stone: "Re: "measure bond" vs veclength"
- Reply: John Stone: "Re: "measure bond" vs veclength"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation. Just curiosity, are the measure
routines of VMD coded in TCL or in C? I guess C, but just checking.
Thanks!
Gianluca
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, John Stone wrote:
> Hi,
> A few points. DCD files store coordinates in single precision only,
> not double precision. Restart files are often double precision,
> but most trajectory formats are only single precision. The various
> "measure" routines in VMD are dominated by single precision since that's
> how VMD also stores atomic coordinates associated with trajectory
> frames currently. Tcl math routines are mostly double precision,
> so there will be differences in rounding, vector length normalization,
> etc if you invoke routines that are doing math in the more conventional
> Tcl way. In any case, since your atomic coordinates in VMD are currently
> only stored in single precision, that's all you should expect from
> most distance measurements and the like. Since floating point is
> non-associative, any change in the order of operations (even a tiny one)
> can cause the results of two otherwise comparable calculations to differ,
> so your results are exactly what I would expect to see.
>
> Cheers,
> John Stone
> vmd_at_ks.uiuc.edu
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:06:03PM -0800, Gianluca Interlandi wrote:
>> Dear vmd list,
>>
>> I noticed that I get slightly different results when I measure the
>> distance between two atoms using "measure bond" vs by measuring the length
>> of the vector between the two atoms. The difference is usually after the
>> 4th decimal after the period. I read in the frames from a NAMD DCD and I
>> use, e.g.,:
>>
>> set index1 [[atomselect top "name CA and resid 1"] get index]
>> set index2 [[atomselect top "name CA and resid 2"] get index]
>> measure bond {$index1 $index2} frame 100
>>
>> which returns "12.263489723205566"
>>
>> But if I calculate the length of the vector between the two atoms with:
>>
>> set sel1 [atomselect top "name CA and resid 1" frame 100]
>> set sel2 [atomselect top "name CA and resid 2" frame 100]
>> set res1 [lindex [$sel1 get {x y z}] 0]
>> set res2 [lindex [$sel2 get {x y z}] 0]
>> veclength [vecsub $res2 $res1]
>>
>> I get "12.26349001762006"
>>
>> Just wondering how come I get two slightly different results? The frames
>> are read from a DCD file that should be double precision. Which of the two
>> methods should be in theory more precise?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Gianluca
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianluca_at_u.washington.edu
>> +1 (206) 685 4435
>> http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/
>>
>> Research Assistant Professor at the Department of Bioengineering
>> at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> NIH Center for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics
> Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology
> University of Illinois, 405 N. Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801
> http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~johns/ Phone: 217-244-3349
> http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/
>
-----------------------------------------------------
Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianluca_at_u.washington.edu
+1 (206) 685 4435
http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/
Research Assistant Professor at the Department of Bioengineering
at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
-----------------------------------------------------
- Next message: John Stone: "Re: "measure bond" vs veclength"
- Previous message: Gianluca Interlandi: ""measure bond" vs veclength"
- In reply to: John Stone: "Re: "measure bond" vs veclength"
- Next in thread: John Stone: "Re: "measure bond" vs veclength"
- Reply: John Stone: "Re: "measure bond" vs veclength"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]