From: Aref Takiden (aref.takiden_at_mailbox.tu-berlin.de)
Date: Mon Sep 29 2014 - 06:07:23 CDT

Hello all,

thank you for your help.. it worked with PyMol :)

Best regards,
Aref

On 26 Sep 2014, at 18:31, Dennis N Bromley <dbromley_at_uw.edu> wrote:

> Hi Aref,
>
> it might be goofing up if (as discussed above) there are a variable number
> of atoms. Try loading it up in pymol, i think it will roll with variable
> atoms. If that reads it up ok, then it means you multi-model pdb file is
> correct, but the variable atom number is causing problems. If you look at
> your multi-model pdb file in a text editor, does it look right? Do you see
> all the models that you think you should be seeing?
>
> -denny-
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Aref Takiden <
> aref.takiden_at_mailbox.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> @Dennis: sorry for the email yesterday X_x
>> However, it didnít worked either, i.e I got only the half of the frames in
>> vmd in spite of that in the collective-pdbs file I find all gathered pdbs