From: Jason Swails (jason.swails_at_gmail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 05 2015 - 07:54:57 CST
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Brian Radak <brian.radak.accts_at_gmail.com>
> Yes? But in a different way. Now LJAvgA and LJAvgB are extremely large and
> the correction becomes effectively infinite. I guess that means the
> overflow is in the double now?
It is *very* hard to overflow a double. You need a number on the order of
10^300 to do that. Double overflow is unlikely.
-- Jason M. Swails BioMaPS, Rutgers University Postdoctoral Researcher
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Dec 31 2015 - 23:22:17 CST