From: Axel Kohlmeyer (akohlmey_at_gmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 12 2010 - 04:56:19 CST
you are - as usual - correct. upon second reading my response
came over much more harsh and much less tongue-in-cheek
than it was intended to be. the "NAMD genius" address was far
too tempting. i guess being named the "official mail list bad cop"
by the LAMMPS folks is getting to my head. ;-)
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Jérôme Hénin <jhenin_at_ifr88.cnrs-mrs.fr> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>> you are trying to run an obsolete beta version.
>> this is an incredibly pointless undertaking.
>> have you tried a proper release version or
>> if you must use a beta version at least the latest one?
> In Pengcheng's defense, I must say the NAMD community doesn't have
> much of a tradition of differentiating between beta and stable
> versions. NAMD 2.5b1 was just _the_ current release (the one everybody
> used) for ages. That said, it is really obsolete now.
-- Dr. Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey_at_gmail.com http://sites.google.com/site/akohlmey/ Institute for Computational Molecular Science Temple University, Philadelphia PA, USA.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:53:53 CST